Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Nil, that’s the problem mate it all still comes down to human error. I would say ultimately we will be better off with VAR than without it but it is never going to be full proof.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Nil, but if it doesn’t pick up a clear penalty there’s something that’s not working properly .
To be fair the reason that VAR is going through this trial period it is, is to iron out the kinks in it and yesterday’s incident hopefully might help towards doing that. Last night was not such an important game but you wouldn’t want it happening in a CL Final for instance and changing the course of a game the wrong way.
It’s the same with the new Retrospective diving rule it was a dive by Pedro and that should get referred to the Retrospective Diving Panel and Pedro should get a two match ban for it .
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Nil@10:53pm he won’t have been talking about the Willan incident though mate and I’ll happily join whoever you heard on Talksport in respect of the Pedro dive which was more than poor and the Norwich player didnβt even touch him and Pedro should be banned for two games for diving imo but he wont be because those rules are cockeyed on that too.
But the Willian incident was a stonewall penalty he didnβt dive and how with VAR it wasnβt given is beyond me as it as a clear and obvious penalty.
I support the difficult job the Refs do and have said previously they donβt have the luxury of reviewing the incident as we do and studying the slo moβs but with VAR they do and they still couldn’t get it right
Even Klosse the Norwich defender who made the tackle has said it was a penalty.
Lotβs more work to do on VAR if the officials mess it up as badly as they did in this gam
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
18th January 2018 at 1:15 am in reply to: Latest Title Odds – Is it still a foregone conclusion? #12906Wrong thread apologies
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Nil, whether Chelsea are through or not is immaterial mate VAR failed badly tonight.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Justice is done though!?
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
VAR fails because it still comes down to an official deciding whether it was a penalty or not the video evidence was clear that it was 100% a penalty and he got the decision wrong.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Completely failed tonight though!
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Mav, crazy money for Sanchez if true but if he helps United win the PL and or the CL?
He could have a real impact at United imo._____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Mav, Β£14m tax free for Carroll. Would be a bargain tho.?
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Mak, affordability and FFP probably mate.
Prior to the sale of Coutinho according to “This is Anfield” including the Keita fee Klopp had spent circa Β£170m net. The Coutinho money puts Klopp’s spending at Β£20m net currently based on the “This is Anfield”figures.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Sean and CM, you’re both right imo.?
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Chelsea to secure a top 4 spot with the signing of Andy Carroll.?
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
City need cover in this position and Evans would be a very good addition to their squad at a reasonable fee not sure how many games he will get to play though.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
“I havenβt seen Conte say anything about Sanchez wages being too high. Iβve seen reports that Chelsea wonβt pay it but this is the first Iβve seen from Conte himself on the subject. I stand to be corrected though. There seems to be a real disconnect between Conte and the Chelsea board re transfers looking in from the outside.”
Ed I think you’re right on all counts mate.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
According to SSN’s Riola has suggested that a deal is far from done with Arsenal for Mikiteryan and the Sanchez move depends on it?
But Riola hasn’t written off the chances of it happening the sticking point seems to be on Arsenal being prepared to match what Mikiteryan is on at United?
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
16th January 2018 at 6:51 pm in reply to: Latest Title Odds – Is it still a foregone conclusion? #12742R, hopes all good with you and the Mrs. You still doing that incredible job out in Africa?
The Martial Art? Lol! There’s more chance of Arsenal winning the CL this season than him posting on here.?
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
16th January 2018 at 6:04 pm in reply to: Latest Title Odds – Is it still a foregone conclusion? #12735Is that you R?
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
ppt, no you’re right Stoke had to turn to someone and they were running out of candidates Lambert was almost last man standing.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Mav, that’s why it’s not just about the money mate Sanchez could have probably earned more in China certainly by moving on a free and agreeing a deal now.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
-
AuthorPosts