Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 3,141 through 3,160 (of 3,927 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Week 6: Hangovers from Mid-Week? #48146
    Mikus LFC
    Participant

      Mak, Ed was talking about moving Woodward back into his old job and that’s what I was responding to – that that would be demoting him which is never ideal. As I say, I suspect he’ll leave the club anyway.

      As for Klopp, yes it’s a good point that he’s had significant help with signings, but as I say I don’t think Utd ever bought into Mourinho’s philosophy and both the recruitment team and manager have to some extent sing from the same hymn sheet. Instead they tried to hold onto their attacking identity by throwing big bucks at “exciting” players like Pogba and Sanchez and instructed Mourinho to buy into that rather than the other way around.

      _____________________________

      React below 👇

      *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

      Loading spinner
      in reply to: Week 6: Hangovers from Mid-Week? #48132
      Mikus LFC
      Participant

        Problem is Ed, you would effectively have to demote Woodward and that’s never ideal in a business environment and going back into your old job is never quite the same as it was. I suspect he’ll leave completely when it comes to it.

        As for the future direction of the club, let’s be honest, whilst money will always play a key role, it’s still ultimately a top manager that gets a club moving because only he can give them that identity and make them feel special so the players can buy into the managers philosophy. Mourinho gets a lot of criticism but he arguably played a key role in setting up Chelsea to the stature they now have – take him out of Chelsea’s history and for all of Roman’s money, I just don’t think they’d be the same club as they are now and the players he bought in set the legacy of the club and made it easier for future managers. Much as Guardiola has done for City. Yet Ferguson didn’t leave Man Utd in a particularly good shape did he? But to be fair he rebuilt several generations of successful teams and 27 years is obviously incredible service so you can’t really have a go at him for the way Utd were left at the end of his reign. So Man Utd needed a new charismatic manager and identity to replace him when he left so that a new chapter could be set in motion. The best they’ve had since is Mourinho yet they didn’t seem to trust him because they were hellbent on keeping their historic identity instead of Mourinho’s identity. Well, that’s not got them far has it?

        _____________________________

        React below 👇

        *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

        Loading spinner
        in reply to: Week 6: Hangovers from Mid-Week? #48090
        Mikus LFC
        Participant

          Not to mention Adrian. Also played very well today.

          _____________________________

          React below 👇

          *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

          Loading spinner
          in reply to: Week 6: Hangovers from Mid-Week? #48074
          Mikus LFC
          Participant

            Liverpool still struggling to assert themselves in big away games. Where is the pressing? Where is the desire we see at home? Does Klopp just overcompensate in being a bit more cautious?

            Also Salah has been awful today.

            _____________________________

            React below 👇

            *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

            Loading spinner
            in reply to: Week 6: Hangovers from Mid-Week? #48068
            Mikus LFC
            Participant

              Just looking somewhat leggy Mak. Opting for the lazy easy option of just wafting the ball up top.

              _____________________________

              React below 👇

              *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

              Loading spinner
              in reply to: Week 6: Hangovers from Mid-Week? #48063
              Mikus LFC
              Participant

                And there it is.

                _____________________________

                React below 👇

                *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                Loading spinner
                in reply to: Week 6: Hangovers from Mid-Week? #48061
                Mikus LFC
                Participant

                  Klopp not happy. So poor in possession.

                  _____________________________

                  React below 👇

                  *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                  Loading spinner
                  in reply to: Week 6: Hangovers from Mid-Week? #48034
                  Mikus LFC
                  Participant

                    Don’t underestimate the negative effect that disallowed goal had on Chelsea which probably contributed to them conceding again.

                    _____________________________

                    React below 👇

                    *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                    Loading spinner
                    in reply to: Week 6: Hangovers from Mid-Week? #48022
                    Mikus LFC
                    Participant

                      Ed, I half think the board didn’t better support Solksjaer a few months ago because they didn’t fully trust him so they just made more essential or younger, longer term signings and they were prepared to take a hit in the short term until they do find a manager they can really back.

                      _____________________________

                      React below 👇

                      *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                      Loading spinner
                      in reply to: Week 6: Hangovers from Mid-Week? #48007
                      Mikus LFC
                      Participant

                        Must seem like an eternity ago for Solskjaer since that unbeaten run last season.

                        _____________________________

                        React below 👇

                        *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                        Loading spinner
                        in reply to: Week 6: Hangovers from Mid-Week? #48000
                        Mikus LFC
                        Participant

                          Liverpool have to be bold and ruthless today. In years gone by drawing away at the top 6 clubs wasn’t a bad result. But the bar has been raised so much now that you just can’t afford to draw these games.

                          _____________________________

                          React below 👇

                          *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                          Loading spinner
                          in reply to: Week 6: Hangovers from Mid-Week? #47958
                          Mikus LFC
                          Participant

                            Nine, if you are caught driving 61 mph in a 60 mph zone, the police won’t stop you if they’re doing checks there because there’s a degree of error in people speedometers and the real world isn’t quite perfect. You have to build in an error margin. Real life isn’t perfect, we should stop trying to enforce it in such a way – particularly on a football pitch where people’s arms and legs positions can rapidly change from one moment to the next. The offside law was ultimately brought in to stop goal hanging, it was later used by defenders to catch attackers offside as a secondary consequence. Now it’s being used in a tertiary way in a way that doesn’t account for reality.

                            _____________________________

                            React below 👇

                            *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                            Loading spinner
                            in reply to: Week 6: Hangovers from Mid-Week? #47954
                            Mikus LFC
                            Participant

                              It’s somewhat ironic that the officials are using the term “clear and obvious” in a vague way in order to hide behind it and relieve them of having to make an actual decision/overruling. I would rather take longer delays whilst the on pitch referee checks the pitch side monitor than all this. This would prevent the fear of having to keep overruling the referee from the VAR truck which would weaken the referee’s integrity. As for the Spurs offside decision today, it was farcical, there’s no other word to describe it.

                              _____________________________

                              React below 👇

                              *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                              Loading spinner
                              in reply to: Week 6: Hangovers from Mid-Week? #47916
                              Mikus LFC
                              Participant

                                Suffice to say City have got that Norwich game out their system.

                                _____________________________

                                React below 👇

                                *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                                Loading spinner
                                in reply to: Euro Footy: Week 1 #47778
                                Mikus LFC
                                Participant

                                  Regarding Zidane & Real Madrid. It’s funny – Lucky mentioned the point about the Watford boss being sacked just to paper over the faults with the team so that it looked like the board were “taking action”. And the same looks true for Madrid. They only sacked their last manager in March, then somewhat desperately thought that the aura of Zidane would magically lift things, and now it seems they’re back to square one again. Clubs really are just obsessed with the short term aren’t they? If these clubs were businesses in any other area of life, they’d be outrage over the sums of money being thrown around for failure. Money that in large part comes from the fans. Could you imagine the protests if they were bankers? But with football most just shrug their shoulders and laugh at it. Strange…

                                  _____________________________

                                  React below 👇

                                  *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                                  Loading spinner
                                  in reply to: Euro Footy: Week 1 #47772
                                  Mikus LFC
                                  Participant

                                    Regarding Zidane and Real Madrid. It’s funny, Lucky mentioned the point about the Watford boss being sacked just to paper over the faults with the team so that it looked like the board were “taking action”. And the same looks true for Madrid. They only sacked their last manager in March then somewhat desperately thought that the aura of Zidane would magically lift things, and now it seems they’re back to square one again. Clubs really are just obsessed with the short term aren’t they? If these clubs were businesses in any other area of life, they’d be outrage over the sums of money being thrown around for failure. Money that in large part comes from the fans. Could you imagine the protests if they were bankers? But with football most just shrug their shoulders and laugh at it. Strange…

                                    _____________________________

                                    React below 👇

                                    *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                                    Loading spinner
                                    in reply to: Spurs Going Forward #47756
                                    Mikus LFC
                                    Participant

                                      Banjo, one wonders if Poch thinks he shouldn’t have signed such a long contract which would have freed him up more to move somewhere else – or it could well have put more pressure on Levy to cough up a bit more on transfers so he wouldn’t lose him if it was a shorter contract. That long contract has done neither side any favours it seems.

                                      _____________________________

                                      React below 👇

                                      *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                                      Loading spinner
                                      in reply to: Liverpool Going Forward #47743
                                      Mikus LFC
                                      Participant

                                        Threeps, yes, we only finished one point behind City with a great points tally, but lest we forget there was an *8* point swing towards City between January and the end of the season between the clubs. Why? Because we weren’t ultimately *bold* enough in the big games and City were. (City’s period of significantly dropped points mainly coincided with injuries to big players over Christmas).

                                        It’s the draws that cost us. You’re better off winning one and losing one than drawing two. It is exactly in this area that City won because they were bolder.

                                        If we are to win the league with Klopp whilst Guardiola is here, we don’t necessarily have to change the staff in midfield, or our approach against the lesser sides, but we do *have* to be bolder in the bigger games.

                                        _____________________________

                                        React below 👇

                                        *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                                        Loading spinner
                                        in reply to: Liverpool Going Forward #47741
                                        Mikus LFC
                                        Participant

                                          Threeps, I very much accept our plan A tends to work very well most of the time, and perhaps if we had not been competing with Guardiola’s City, one wouldn’t need to go through our team with a fine tooth comb. But we are, so we have to.

                                          This is about making us as robust as possible. Just to be clear, I’m not suggesting we ought to have gone out and bought a luxury attacking midfielder, but I do think it’s not a lot to expect that at least a few of our hard working midfielders also have that goal scoring ability. Indeed we saw how crucial those Wijnaldum goals were vs Barcelona. But we just needed a bit more of that versatility and back up at times.

                                          Now you might argue that had we instructed our midfield to be more aggressive, that might have cost us at the back. But interestingly I would argue this risk factor is exactly where we lost out to City last season. I think for a large part of last season Klopp was trying to find the balance between defence and attack, and we obviously operated in a less gung ho fashion than we had been. That for a large part was obviously a *good* thing. However, in the *big* games last season, particularly in the 6 pointer at the Etihad, we lost that attacking edge that saw us win there previously. So this is perhaps more of a big game problem where we’ve lost our edge. And look at our results in the bigger games last season – we lost every away game in the CL group stage, barely making it out the group. We gained just 1/6 points in the huge games vs City, and we dropped points against Everton & Man Utd, i.e. the biggest games in our calendar.

                                          It might seem harsh, but we have to examine such things when the opposition is formidable. Whether Keita and Ox would have made a difference, well I think they would have, though thinking more about it, I think a lot of it was ultimately down to this balance of risk in the bigger games that Klopp was clearly grappling with last season. And just to link this back to the Wijnaldum point above – why did we deliver in that game? – because the “risk balance” was somewhat thrown out because we *had* to go for it. And what happened? We won and won big!

                                          _____________________________

                                          React below 👇

                                          *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                                          Loading spinner
                                          in reply to: Liverpool Going Forward #47738
                                          Mikus LFC
                                          Participant

                                            Threeps, as I said on TT, I very much accept our plan A tends to work very well most of the time, and perhaps if we had not been competing with Guardiola’s City, one wouldn’t need to go through our team with a fine tooth comb. But we are, so we have to.

                                            This is about making us as robust as possible. Just to be clear, I’m not suggesting we ought to have gone out and bought a luxury attacking midfielder, but I do think it’s not a lot to expect that at least a few of our hard working midfielders also have that goal scoring ability. Indeed we saw how crucial those Wijnaldum goals were vs Barcelona. But we just needed a bit more of that versatility and back up at times.

                                            Now you might argue that had we instructed our midfield to be more aggressive, that might have cost us at the back. But interestingly I would argue this risk factor is exactly where we lost out to City last season. I think for a large part of last season Klopp was trying to find the balance between defence and attack, and we obviously operated in a less gung ho fashion than we had been. That for a large part was obviously a *good* thing. However, in the *big* games last season, particularly in the 6 pointer at the Etihad, we lost that attacking edge that saw us win there previously. So this is perhaps more of a big game problem where we’ve lost our edge. And look at our results in the bigger games last season – we lost every away game in the CL group stage, barely making it out the group. We gained just 1/6 points in the huge games vs City, and we dropped points against Everton & Man Utd, i.e. the biggest games in our calendar.

                                            It might seem harsh, but we have to examine such things when the opposition is formidable. Whether Keita and Ox would have made a difference, well I think they would have, though thinking more about it, I think a lot of it was ultimately down to this balance of risk in the bigger games that Klopp was clearly grappling with last season. And just to link this back to the Wijnaldum point above – why did we deliver in that game? – because the “risk balance” was somewhat thrown out because we *had* to go for it. And what happened? We won and won big!

                                            _____________________________

                                            React below 👇

                                            *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                                            Loading spinner
                                          Viewing 20 posts - 3,141 through 3,160 (of 3,927 total)