Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
City boy, you and adlab are clutching at straws pointing at Chelsea and drawing comparisons.
Offering an extended contract that is fully disclosed and fully understood by all to reduce annual cost of fee is not even remotely close to setting up bogus sponsorships that were chiefly funded by city owners not the companies listed to the tune of billions.
One is open and transparent, the other is deliberately deceptive.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Southampton sack Jones, 9th sacking of season
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Potter getting some real stick for not getting emotional about the denied penalty. Some chelsea fans and many pundits saying he should have been fuming in post match and making it the narrative.
I don’t know if he could win here. If he did come out like Jose, klopp or arteta would he would be criticised for blaming dropped points on a bad decision after all the money he spent. If he takes it on chin he is naive.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
9th sacking of season incoming…
Saints were 1-0 up against wolves who were down to 10 men 27 mins in…
its now Southampton 1- 2 wolves.
Nathan Jones pack your bags my taffy brother from another mother!
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Big goal for trossard and arsenal
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Yeah adlab, no one forcing you to have to defend this and you honestly don’t need to.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
“Lucky. The answer is I donβt know. But City say they havenβt misrepresented information.”
Adlab, Neither of us know 100%, but what is more likely in your estimation? You seem logical when it suits mate, apply it here, those deals are suspicious and add the leaked emails to it and it is certainly due of investigation.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Adlab, I can understand why you are sick of it but it’s not on us or the press mate it is what it is.
I ask you what I asked Paul, do you believe that the unprecedented growth of commercial revenue that took city above real and utd was legitimate? ie did the companies involved truly value the deals at this level and fund them themselves out of their own budgets, or, do you think they were actually artificially inflated and in fact funded by city owners with funds routed via these affiliated companies?
Now with all your experience can you tell me what it’s called when you misrepresent finances this way. I don’t know whether it’s money laundering, fraud or both but it’s obviously deliberately deceptive so whether you can argue it’s technically permissable is besides the point, city were bound to face backlash for deception at such a scale.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Come on Leicester!
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Yeah agree Sean defo an improvement π
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Lol Joe Cole saying Potter should have been blaming the handball in post match and making that the narrative like Jose would, he says its a bit of naivety. Rio and zola agreeing π
I can see his point but the focus should be our performance.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Yeah banjo they were good value for the point, I think we had enough chances to win but can’t argue that we should have.
Enzo and felix by far our best players today.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Ed, providing they predicted all 100 plus charges and are sure they covered all bases maybe.
Like I said, whether it is city ownership or the Premier league itself, someone is going to get embarrassed.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Paul, forget the CAS ruling and answer my question, do you think it was legitimate commercial growth or artificial?
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Nine, 4 years is a long time for this to he hanging over a club, surely if city know they are in right and can defend against all charges they will do all they can to ensure this is completed as soon as possible?
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
“The panel found City should have cooperated with the investigation, and fined the Blues 10million euros.”
Surely not Paul, City welcome the opportunity to clear their name why on earth would they not fully cooperate?
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Adlab, why on earth would you believe city would cut a deal if innocent?
Further, it doesn’t matter whether we think FFP is fair or not..you cant just abide by the rules that suit you! You cant put two fingers up to rules you think are unfair AND expect all the other teams that comply with rules to sit back and do nothing, therefore you can’t play victim if they do investigate and charge, it’s the type of gaslighting abusers and psychopaths use!
What will happen will happen but and like I said, whether it is city or the prem league, someone is going to be properly embarrassed here, as long as it takes.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Paul, I agree innocent until proven guilty but this victim complex from city is ridiculous, they say they welcome the chance to finally clear their name but have done nothing but obstruct and hinder investigation for years. I can’t believe this would still be ongoing if there wasn’t real evidence and I hope for you city fans that your confidence is well founded and proven justified.
Do you think city growing commercial revenue to above utd and real Madrid in space of a few years was legit? or do you believe the majority of that money came from city owners and routed via the sponsors, ie etihad? both logic and the leaked emails would suggest it is completely artificial.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Ed, nine, spot on imo lads π
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Actually banjo I first thought you were suggesting 8 new teams per group ie 32 new places in ESL available each year but actually its just 8 at the bottom. Yes it’s better than the current ESL proposal but both far inferior to current model imo where there are new teams at all tiers every year and someone can go from no Europe to top tier of european competition based on league finish in one year.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
-
AuthorPosts