Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
14th August 2023 at 10:49 pm in reply to: Kick Off 2023-24 Gameweek 1 – Weekend Action – it’s back! #208379
Yeah Ed,I take your point on eriksen I was looking purely at the players available today and thinking in terms of just today’s game. He obviously can’t be the main man now you are right.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
14th August 2023 at 10:30 pm in reply to: Kick Off 2023-24 Gameweek 1 – Weekend Action – it’s back! #208377I think while it’s not mounts best position, given what utd currently have, mount should play as left mid in 4231 shape out of possession as he is very willing to defend all day long in wide area’s and presses really well.
Bissaka, varane, martinez,Shaw
*******Casemiro, erikson
Anthony,*****Bruno,*****mount
************rashfordThen when utd switch to possession mount moves in to a 10 and Shaw is allowed to be high and wide with erikson helping casemiro control midfield from deep;
****Bissaka****varane****martinez
**********casemiro, erikson
Anthony,***Bruno,***Mount,***Shaw
*************rashford_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
14th August 2023 at 10:19 pm in reply to: Kick Off 2023-24 Gameweek 1 – Weekend Action – it’s back! #208374Ed, hearing you linked with Pavard. That’s a good shout mate he could help your midfield in this type of system as inverted full back but could also play outside right of the base of 3 when you are in possession too.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
14th August 2023 at 10:14 pm in reply to: Kick Off 2023-24 Gameweek 1 – Weekend Action – it’s back! #208370Sean, the way utd played today, mount and Bruno both played almost as double 10s behind rashford with garnacho and Anthony providing width.
His best position for chelsea was also one of a pair of 10s behind a striker but at Chelsea the width was provided by wing backs.
I think where he was played today suits him better than any other position but the system overall did not work for the players altogether. Mount just had a bad game too.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
14th August 2023 at 10:09 pm in reply to: Kick Off 2023-24 Gameweek 1 – Weekend Action – it’s back! #208366Ed, he had games like this for us and it was his debut so its not surprising. I am sure you will see the best of him too but he is hit and miss.
I always believed he had potential to be world class, he hasn’t reached that level yet but is very talented nonetheless and that he was “one of our own” made it easy to put faith in him. He will need to step his game up from what he was doing at Chelsea to win you over mate because understandably utd fans don’t have that bias.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
14th August 2023 at 10:05 pm in reply to: Kick Off 2023-24 Gameweek 1 – Weekend Action – it’s back! #208363Yeah Alfie that midfield set up looks wrong given the players around them. Different full backs needed for sure to make it work.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
14th August 2023 at 10:01 pm in reply to: Kick Off 2023-24 Gameweek 1 – Weekend Action – it’s back! #208359Tough on wolves who look like they can cause problems on the counter to a lot of teams this year.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
14th August 2023 at 9:49 pm in reply to: Kick Off 2023-24 Gameweek 1 – Weekend Action – it’s back! #208348Adlab, I ain’t waxing lyrical about utd mate
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
14th August 2023 at 9:45 pm in reply to: Kick Off 2023-24 Gameweek 1 – Weekend Action – it’s back! #208346That fabio silva lad is back for wolves after season away on loan. He is a manager killer that lad 😆
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
14th August 2023 at 9:38 pm in reply to: Kick Off 2023-24 Gameweek 1 – Weekend Action – it’s back! #208343Yeah Sean Wolves didn’t make the most of their opportunities and fair play to utd for punishing them as expected. Different game for wolves now they can’t rely on counter.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
14th August 2023 at 9:00 pm in reply to: Kick Off 2023-24 Gameweek 1 – Weekend Action – it’s back! #208336Lol I know nil it’s not nice seeing mount in utd shirt.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
14th August 2023 at 8:28 pm in reply to: Kick Off 2023-24 Gameweek 1 – Weekend Action – it’s back! #208331Just mount and the keeper new for utd nil
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
14th August 2023 at 8:14 pm in reply to: Kick Off 2023-24 Gameweek 1 – Weekend Action – it’s back! #208327Wolves lost so many players this summer, no wonder their coach quit.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Yes Alfie, the cash flow has certainly been subsidised massively, however owner injections won’t count as positives on the balance sheet for accounting purposes and the expenditure will need to be accounted for against incomings.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
This was the spirit of the club in the 90s when I was a kid, pushed itself financially to brink of destruction because it wouldn’t settle for being an also ran. Met its luck halfway, but got lucky nonetheless.
I don’t think Todd is banking on luck, but I am eternally aware our luck will dry up sooner or later.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
In an ideal world yes there one or two more needed and nkunku is a loss with injury.
However, you will not see me asking for it 😆 Spoiled sod I am.
I think we have enough to compete for top 4 now no doubt and that’s more than I genuinely have a right to demand as a fan of Chelsea.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Sean, all our sales this year just cancel out this year’s amortised outgoings regards the overall investment. Next year we will have another full year’s worth to cover. If our recruitment hasn’t been good enough to continue to get high returns in transfer sales each year we not only won’t be able to sign anyone, but we will have to sell some of our best players.
We will likely have to raise 150m in the market every summer to maintain the ability to bring players in.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
No banjo, you bought him for 50m, sell him for 40m, and so overall have net loss of 10m.
However in terms of accounting for all this yearly for FFP, outgoings of 10m have been recorded on the accounts for the previous 3 years. Its already accounted for.
At the time of sale, there is still 20m outstanding over the next 2 years. The 40m received cancels this out and creates a surplus of 20m.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Threeps, I’m talking purely in terms of accounting. In general I think fees are paid off quicker than they are amortised as usually a lump sum is paid up front.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
If you sold him for 40m after 3 years there would only be 20m left on books, it would be drawn down that year as a 20m net positive on the accounts. (40-20).
That might not make sense at first because you would expect 10m loss not 20m profit, because player was bought for 50m and sold for 40m, right?
However, if you add the 30m already paid and accounted for over previous 3 years to the 20m profit recorded on the accounts it’s (-30) +20 =-10m
It’s shows as a 20m positive after 3 years because 30m has already been recorded as losses over previous 3 years
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
-
AuthorPosts