Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 181 through 200 (of 3,501 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Luckydestiny
    Participant

      Yeah Ed,I take your point on eriksen I was looking purely at the players available today and thinking in terms of just today’s game. He obviously can’t be the main man now you are right.

      _____________________________

      React below 👇

      *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

      Loading spinner
      Luckydestiny
      Participant

        I think while it’s not mounts best position, given what utd currently have, mount should play as left mid in 4231 shape out of possession as he is very willing to defend all day long in wide area’s and presses really well.

        Bissaka, varane, martinez,Shaw
        *******Casemiro, erikson
        Anthony,*****Bruno,*****mount
        ************rashford

        Then when utd switch to possession mount moves in to a 10 and Shaw is allowed to be high and wide with erikson helping casemiro control midfield from deep;

        ****Bissaka****varane****martinez
        **********casemiro, erikson
        Anthony,***Bruno,***Mount,***Shaw
        *************rashford

        _____________________________

        React below 👇

        *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

        Loading spinner
        Luckydestiny
        Participant

          Ed, hearing you linked with Pavard. That’s a good shout mate he could help your midfield in this type of system as inverted full back but could also play outside right of the base of 3 when you are in possession too.

          _____________________________

          React below 👇

          *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

          Loading spinner
          Luckydestiny
          Participant

            Sean, the way utd played today, mount and Bruno both played almost as double 10s behind rashford with garnacho and Anthony providing width.

            His best position for chelsea was also one of a pair of 10s behind a striker but at Chelsea the width was provided by wing backs.

            I think where he was played today suits him better than any other position but the system overall did not work for the players altogether. Mount just had a bad game too.

            _____________________________

            React below 👇

            *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

            Loading spinner
            Luckydestiny
            Participant

              Ed, he had games like this for us and it was his debut so its not surprising. I am sure you will see the best of him too but he is hit and miss.

              I always believed he had potential to be world class, he hasn’t reached that level yet but is very talented nonetheless and that he was “one of our own” made it easy to put faith in him. He will need to step his game up from what he was doing at Chelsea to win you over mate because understandably utd fans don’t have that bias.

              _____________________________

              React below 👇

              *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

              Loading spinner
              Luckydestiny
              Participant

                Yeah Alfie that midfield set up looks wrong given the players around them. Different full backs needed for sure to make it work.

                _____________________________

                React below 👇

                *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                Loading spinner
                Luckydestiny
                Participant

                  Tough on wolves who look like they can cause problems on the counter to a lot of teams this year.

                  _____________________________

                  React below 👇

                  *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                  Loading spinner
                  Luckydestiny
                  Participant

                    Adlab, I ain’t waxing lyrical about utd mate

                    _____________________________

                    React below 👇

                    *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                    Loading spinner
                    Luckydestiny
                    Participant

                      That fabio silva lad is back for wolves after season away on loan. He is a manager killer that lad 😆

                      _____________________________

                      React below 👇

                      *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                      Loading spinner
                      Luckydestiny
                      Participant

                        Yeah Sean Wolves didn’t make the most of their opportunities and fair play to utd for punishing them as expected. Different game for wolves now they can’t rely on counter.

                        _____________________________

                        React below 👇

                        *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                        Loading spinner
                        Luckydestiny
                        Participant

                          Lol I know nil it’s not nice seeing mount in utd shirt.

                          _____________________________

                          React below 👇

                          *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                          Loading spinner
                          Luckydestiny
                          Participant

                            Just mount and the keeper new for utd nil

                            _____________________________

                            React below 👇

                            *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                            Loading spinner
                            Luckydestiny
                            Participant

                              Wolves lost so many players this summer, no wonder their coach quit.

                              _____________________________

                              React below 👇

                              *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                              Loading spinner
                              in reply to: Summer 2023 transfer window #208324
                              Luckydestiny
                              Participant

                                Yes Alfie, the cash flow has certainly been subsidised massively, however owner injections won’t count as positives on the balance sheet for accounting purposes and the expenditure will need to be accounted for against incomings.

                                _____________________________

                                React below 👇

                                *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                                Loading spinner
                                in reply to: Summer 2023 transfer window #208322
                                Luckydestiny
                                Participant

                                  This was the spirit of the club in the 90s when I was a kid, pushed itself financially to brink of destruction because it wouldn’t settle for being an also ran. Met its luck halfway, but got lucky nonetheless.

                                  I don’t think Todd is banking on luck, but I am eternally aware our luck will dry up sooner or later.

                                  _____________________________

                                  React below 👇

                                  *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                                  Loading spinner
                                  in reply to: Summer 2023 transfer window #208321
                                  Luckydestiny
                                  Participant

                                    In an ideal world yes there one or two more needed and nkunku is a loss with injury.

                                    However, you will not see me asking for it 😆 Spoiled sod I am.

                                    I think we have enough to compete for top 4 now no doubt and that’s more than I genuinely have a right to demand as a fan of Chelsea.

                                    _____________________________

                                    React below 👇

                                    *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                                    Loading spinner
                                    in reply to: Summer 2023 transfer window #208319
                                    Luckydestiny
                                    Participant

                                      Sean, all our sales this year just cancel out this year’s amortised outgoings regards the overall investment. Next year we will have another full year’s worth to cover. If our recruitment hasn’t been good enough to continue to get high returns in transfer sales each year we not only won’t be able to sign anyone, but we will have to sell some of our best players.

                                      We will likely have to raise 150m in the market every summer to maintain the ability to bring players in.

                                      _____________________________

                                      React below 👇

                                      *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                                      Loading spinner
                                      in reply to: Summer 2023 transfer window #208314
                                      Luckydestiny
                                      Participant

                                        No banjo, you bought him for 50m, sell him for 40m, and so overall have net loss of 10m.

                                        However in terms of accounting for all this yearly for FFP, outgoings of 10m have been recorded on the accounts for the previous 3 years. Its already accounted for.

                                        At the time of sale, there is still 20m outstanding over the next 2 years. The 40m received cancels this out and creates a surplus of 20m.

                                        _____________________________

                                        React below 👇

                                        *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                                        Loading spinner
                                        in reply to: Summer 2023 transfer window #208308
                                        Luckydestiny
                                        Participant

                                          Threeps, I’m talking purely in terms of accounting. In general I think fees are paid off quicker than they are amortised as usually a lump sum is paid up front.

                                          _____________________________

                                          React below 👇

                                          *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                                          Loading spinner
                                          in reply to: Summer 2023 transfer window #208303
                                          Luckydestiny
                                          Participant

                                            If you sold him for 40m after 3 years there would only be 20m left on books, it would be drawn down that year as a 20m net positive on the accounts. (40-20).

                                            That might not make sense at first because you would expect 10m loss not 20m profit, because player was bought for 50m and sold for 40m, right?

                                            However, if you add the 30m already paid and accounted for over previous 3 years to the 20m profit recorded on the accounts it’s (-30) +20 =-10m

                                            It’s shows as a 20m positive after 3 years because 30m has already been recorded as losses over previous 3 years

                                            _____________________________

                                            React below 👇

                                            *hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted

                                            Loading spinner
                                          Viewing 20 posts - 181 through 200 (of 3,501 total)