Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Liverpool lads. What’s your assessment as to what is going wrong?
Brighton are OK but 3-0? Do you think Klopp is under pressure or what?_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Last comment.
How is Rashford not interfering with play if he chases the ball to the area until the last second_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
I don’t like losing of course but this is a cheat. But perhaps everyone else who thought it was offside is wrong.
Only one report says the goal should have stood._____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
All was going fine – until they found themselves on the wrong end of a highly contentious refereeing decision. Casemiro pushed a ball through for Marcus Rashford, who ran to the edge of City’s area before leaving the ball for Bruno Fernandes to fire home.
The linesman rightly flagged Rashford offside, before the referee came over and decided that because Rashford hadn’t touched the ball he had not interfered with it – despite commanding all of the attention of the City defenders. Guardiola vented his fury at the fourth official, the players went spare at the on-field ref but the goal stood.
Another journalist comment.
SORE LOSER? ABSOLUTELY_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Nine .
It’s about opinions but looking through the paper comments it’s almost all one direction. The goal should not have stood._____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Another
But after Rashford failed to touch the ball on his run towards the goal, Bruno Fernandes ran onto it and found the back of the net.Law 11, which details the offside law, states in section two: “Making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ball.”
City argued that goalkeeper Ederson had been pulled out from his goal line due to Rashford’s positioning.
Even Chelsea legend Petr Cech was left baffled by the decision
F..ing cheat. Sorry but its not just me
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Keith Hakett in the Telegraph
There is no doubt: Marcus Rashford is offside. He has impacted on play and he is interfering with an opponent…._____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
And another
It is, without doubt, the main topic of debate from Saturday’s Manchester derby – should Bruno Fernandes’ equaliser have stood?In the 78th minute at Old Trafford, the Portuguese midfielder converted past Ederson with a cool finish. But the goal was shrouded in controversy after many deemed Rashford to be interfering with play.
The England international did not touch the ball after clearly coming from an offside position, but some were convinced that he played a part by obstructing City’s defence before Fernandes fired home.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Per BBC report
Rashford was clearly offside as he chased Casemiro’s pass, but did not touch the ball, leaving it for Fernandes to whip his finish beyond Ederson.City’s argument, with justification, was that Rashford was having a significant impact on the incident even without touching the ball because his presence clearly put him in a position where he had an effect on Nathan Ake and Manuel Akanji’s ability to make a challenge.
Referee Stuart Attwell consulted his assistant and the goal was given, much to City’s anger as their players confronted the official at the final whistle.
That’s the BBC reporters view
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Sean. I did see the posts!!
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Carefully watched this again.
Rashford didn’t touch the ball but was offsides but the argument is that his offside position- according to the rule I have just read – did interfere with play quite clearly and therefore the offside should have stood, but a more difficult interpretation. But it was offside but its the sort of decision you get at home._____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Ed
Well done.
Can you explain why the first goal is allowed_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
But Nike, before all that Rashford was offside.
And the linesman flagged._____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Rashford is running through is offside when he gets the ball. This leads to the goal. How does this stand?
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
All over now.
But all of you explain how the first goal is allowed ._____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
I’m waiting for an explanation as to why Rashford was nor offside
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Total bloody nonsense. How is their first goal allowed. Just watched it again. It’s impossible Rashford received the ball and wad offsides.
CAN SOMEBODY EXPLAIN_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
But when Rashford got the ball he wad offside
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Please explain somebody why United first goal was allowed
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
