Home › Community › General Football › Weekend Football – Gameweek 19
- This topic has 260 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 3 years, 11 months ago by sean the sailor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
20th January 2021 at 8:15 pm #174074
You clearly donโt know the rules then lads ffs. Everyone knew they was offside as blaze says so. Fucking gobshite
_____________________________
React below ๐
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th January 2021 at 8:20 pm #174075Really good game and a great strike by Silva Villa unlucky though a massively improved team. Worrying injury to De Bruyne.
_____________________________
React below ๐
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th January 2021 at 8:41 pm #174076So sorry Sean thought you were serious, didn’t realize you were teasing the guy but nevertheless let’s not argue over it as it was a real great game to treasure. There’s too many controversial offside decisions in football so moments like that should not be added to yet another offside goal. Same as if an attackers nose or any irrelevant part of his body is captured as offside the goal should stand.
_____________________________
React below ๐
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th January 2021 at 8:50 pm #174077Blaze, thatโs not strictly true about the offside, the player can be standing in an offside position when the ball is played forward and if a defending team player deliberately plays the ball then heโs not offside even if he doesnโt get back onside…..Pagan
_____________________________
React below ๐
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th January 2021 at 8:53 pm #174078Here’s what former Premier League referee Peter Walton made of Manchester City’s first goal on BT Sport:
“My initial thoughts were as Mings played the ball, it wasn’t a deliberate play on the ball, so therefore, didn’t play the player onside.
“However, the law says: ‘A player in an offisde position, receiving the ball from an opponent who deliberately plays the ball, is NOT to be considered to have gained an advantage.’
“Therefore, Mings playing the ball deliberately – and we can see that he does that when he chests the ball – plays the Manchester City player onside, even though he is in an offside position. So therefore, the goal should stand.
“Rodri wasn’t gaining an advantage by being where he was, that’s the law and the fact that Mings makes a deliberate play on the ball, negates the fact that the player was in an offside position.”
Per BBC SITE. Still not that clear!_____________________________
React below ๐
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th January 2021 at 9:04 pm #174079To be honest Adlab, I thought that was fairly common knowledge…..Pagan
_____________________________
React below ๐
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th January 2021 at 9:22 pm #174080Pagan.
I think it’s a stupid rule. Too much to interprate for me_____________________________
React below ๐
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th January 2021 at 9:32 pm #174081No worries blaze. Letโs start afresh me abd you. I was being prickly after you called me a pussey a few weeks ago ๐ letโs move on chum
_____________________________
React below ๐
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th January 2021 at 9:34 pm #174082Spot on Sean ๐
_____________________________
React below ๐
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th January 2021 at 9:58 pm #174083We didn’t stay top for long
_____________________________
React below ๐
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th January 2021 at 10:11 pm #174084Lovely goal from Pogba. Another comeback and another away win for Utd.
_____________________________
React below ๐
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th January 2021 at 10:42 pm #174085Fulham are in a false position. Good team who have enough to get out of the bottom 3
Excellent win for utd
_____________________________
React below ๐
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
21st January 2021 at 11:06 am #174087Two very harsh decisions on Villa but on the basis of the current and flawed rules both were correct. I would have been furious if it had been the other way. However I do resent some of the media comment particularly from former Liverpool players and pundits not least the Liverpool Echo.
Why do they have such a chip oh their shoulders. They won the league last year and are only a couple of points behind. Perhaps Liverpool lads on here can explain .
I looked at the rules this morning(nothing better to do) and Mings, attempted to control the ball started a new phase of play. Mings then lost the ball so Rodri’s previous offside position was negated. Had Mings not played the ball and and not attempted to control it it would have been offside. Utterly stupid rule. However Dean Smith should know the rules and was correctly red carded._____________________________
React below ๐
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
21st January 2021 at 12:04 pm #174088Mings
Never even heard of that rule, just let players stand offside, then run back & tackle you? In hindsight I shouldโve cleared it, 100%, but didnโt even know that was the case. NonsenseSorry chum ignorance is no excuse when it comes to laws whether civil, criminal or in your profession.
But, I do agree…”nonsense”_____________________________
React below ๐
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
21st January 2021 at 12:25 pm #174089Itโs a stupid rule adlab to be honest mate. What does mings do then? Not go near the ball. What if the defenders doesnโt k ow there is someone behind him??
It was the correct decision going by the letter of the law
Why would you be reading the Liverpool echo?
Your the most biased person on this site chum so I wouldnโt mind the pundits
_____________________________
React below ๐
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
21st January 2021 at 2:11 pm #174090Liverpool Echo. When I look at the City page on Newsnow articles concerning City are highlighted some of which are in the Echo. I look at some of them to see what they say on the basis that they have come on the City page.
We all agree about the stupid rule. You put it very well. What was Mings supposed to do. Easy with hindsight…clear it,
Hope you and your family are keeping safe
_____________________________
React below ๐
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
21st January 2021 at 2:13 pm #174091PS
me biased….never ๐_____________________________
React below ๐
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
21st January 2021 at 2:18 pm #174092I actually thought it was bad defending from Mings, looked he was trying to control it with his knee I think. Remember a few years back an attacker was also offside run back and headed it out the keepers hands and then scored. Basically it boils down to a lack of awareness.
_____________________________
React below ๐
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
21st January 2021 at 2:22 pm #174093Super strike from Silva for the first goal. What led up to the strike though might be within the laws of the game but if the laws of the game deem it ok “the laws an ass”.
Villa can consider themselves very unlucky to lose to both the goals they lost to last night.
And laws like this together with the offside rule that rules a player offside if he scores when his hand might be offside when a line is drawn against it in a freeze frame need urgent review imo!
_____________________________
React below ๐
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
21st January 2021 at 3:17 pm #174094Cheers adlab. At end of the day city deserved to win
Huge improvements from cancelo and particularly John stones.
I also think utd are genuine contenders. Ole now knows his best 11 and he has a plan.
If they can steer clear of injuries who k owe what could happen
_____________________________
React below ๐
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.