- This topic has 48 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 1 month ago by
.
-
Posts
-
With all this talk about 115, I wonder if anything, how do Chelsea have all these players and have spent what appears to be so much??
_____________________________
React below š
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Just an awful outfit and this is my personal opinion, apart from Cole Palmer….Nothing like how it was under the days of Jose and even before that with Raneri.
_____________________________
React below š
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Well, the authorities have the answer to that question. The way the media and rival fans want Chelsea to be charged is crazy. But at least Chelsea is safe for now. Do you think the premier league would have let Chelsea of the hook if we had been guilty? No chance!
On the footballing matter, we are coming out from a bad slump. Iām delighted we have finally stopped to rot, now we can look forward with our game against City. Anything other than a defeat will be fantastic.
_____________________________
React below š
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
I think you’ll find how the Jammy Todgers got away with it is one of the greatest mysteries in the world, even with the questionable tactic of selling themselves their own hotel.
_____________________________
React below š
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
I think you’ll find how the Jammy Todgers got away with it is one of the greatest mysteries in the world, even with the questionable tactic of selling themselves their own hotel.
_____________________________
React below š
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
The issue is, we don’t judge things according to your perception or my perception. The authorities set the rules based on legal bases that guide what is acceptable and what is not. So if the authorities said it’s legal, even after investigating it for more than 6 months, then any other opinion is redundant. As long as it’s in the books, it’s legal to use it.
_____________________________
React below š
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Well, in my books, this isn’t a plain-sailing routine, like it or not. Unrecognisable faces from one game to the next and I’m thinking: “who’s he?” Admittedly, I don’t watch Chelsea a lot; purely down my underlying thoughts on disparity. The policies applied seem different compared to the other 19 teams of the Top Flight League!!
_____________________________
React below š
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Just because us as rival fans don’t like doesn’t mean it’s wrong. As YB says it has been investigated and cleared of any malpractice so there’s no point moaning about it.
And please no one ever say morally it’s incorrect, the times when morals where present in football have long gone.
If there’s someone to moan at then it’s those who make the rules, not the clubs who use them as much as possible to their advantage.
_____________________________
React below š
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
It’s about the oversized squad which in my eyes is unfair advantage. Whether or not it’s a moan, opposition fans won’t just shut-up-shop and not bring out into the open what their eyes are seeing.
I thought a maximum 25 players are allowed as registered A’ list. Checking Wiki which was last updated on the 15th and I’m seeing on there 34 players.
Offering highly long contracts to get around Financial Fair play needs to be looked at. Essentially disgraceful and there should be harsher penalties if found guilty of breach.
Nobody seems to be batting an eyelid so it seems!!
_____________________________
React below š
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.