- This topic has 120 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 5 years, 2 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Actually, 38 divided by 0 is zero, so that team would be the worst team in the league and therefore should be relegated… π
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Brian, it’s true that people have spoken of City “having a weak defence” but this is a discussion in relative terms. With Laporte out, it is a more valid one too, as he’s dispelled an awful lot of the talk. I’m not too worried for City’s defence though. if you lads have to make a tough decision, you can put Fernandinho there for a game or 2, you won’t starve.
Interested in doing a cup swap this season? CL for the PL ? π One time offer!
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Banjo, trust me mate, 38 divided by 0 is not 0. You can not divide anything by 0, it is an irrational operation and is undefined.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
OK Carol no need to get nerdy on us, we are failed students of the university of life dont you know!
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Carol (no idea why but I like it!), my Casio says 38 divided by 0 is 0… so I don’t know what to believe.. π
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Vorderman …..
he is no Rachel Riley so i went old Skool Nancy, but it seems ot work π
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Does this also mean when the Goonies score 0 goals and the other team scores 12, they can claim the score is undefined and declare themselves Champions of Woolich or something? π
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Old Skool Carol… I like it!!
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Get a new calculator banjo π If it was a scientific calculator it should say error when dividing anything my 0. Even the calculator on by mobile says can not divide by 0 when I tried to do it just now to see if it gave me 0 also.
Dont need a calculator to understand it though banjo, just go to your kitchen, get an apple, and try dividing it into zero parts π
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
sounds good to me….and we could have done with that system when we were getting absolutley spanked by united and liverpool every year in ever increasingly embarassing scorelines
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
mmm Rachel Riley
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Love my CASIO, type in 55378008 and turn it upside down, great fun!!
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
id say mmm to both to be fair i grew up with Carol on tv and then Rachel and they both have a special little place
mainly on an old flannel……
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Oh dear, Old Skool Carol sounds like she bats for the other side…
It is depressing when you remember Rachel is bonking some Russian knob…
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
dont get me started, especially as she is a local girl to myself….so close yet so many squillions of miles away….
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Sorry Waspy, needed to be done…
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
“Lucky, so you have to manipulate a system to make it work”
You don’t though because this 38 wins by 1-0 is only possible by 1 team and in this scenario goals don’t matter. If you want to throw in some 0-0 draws then ok, it’s possible but if something like this were ever to happen then you’d have bigger problems than what to do about the goals.
It’s almost a mathematical certainty that this “flaw” would never see the light of day. It’s simply resolved by adding 1 to goals conceded though. This really isn’t worthy of discussion though TBH. The goal average system on the whole does seem to be a good system.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Exactly Mak, and the only reason such a record would lead to an absurd average of 38 is because the record itself is absurd.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
We use to have goal average, weβve now got goal difference, and weβre now talking about goal ratio.
If you want all out exciting attacking football then goal average is the way to go as a 5-4 victory is better for the winning team than a 4-0 victory.
…..Pagan
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.