Home › Community › General Football › Juventus (and spurs transfer guy)
- This topic has 7 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 10 months ago by CM.
-
AuthorPosts
-
20th January 2023 at 9:26 pm #203134
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th January 2023 at 9:27 pm #203135“Juventus have been deducted 15 Serie A points for alleged financial irregularities and false accounting, while Tottenham’s transfer chief Fabio Paratici has been handed a two-and-a-half-year ban from Italian football for his involvement.”
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th January 2023 at 9:32 pm #203137Juventus now 10th in serie A
Jose be buzzing! Almost impossible for him to finish top 4 with his roma against Napoli, AC, Inter and Juventus, with Juve out of the way Roma can fight it out with Lazio and Atalanta for the 4th champs league spot.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th January 2023 at 9:35 pm #203138Would imagine spurs be best to suspend him indefinitely while they can look in to it themselves.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
21st January 2023 at 9:06 am #203139Lucky, I’m pretty sure that the Italian football authorities will have gone through this situation in great detail before handing out the stringent punishments they have that information would presumably be available to Spurs.
If it widens out into punishment by FIFA and UEFA as suggested it might by Sky that would give Spurs a problem and it would be difficult for Paratici to continue but if that doesn’t happen and Paratici has done nothing wrong at Spurs I’m not sure what action Spurs could take without both parties come to an agreement to separate.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
21st January 2023 at 1:33 pm #203154They should have hired 30 lawyers, dragged it on by delaying it and then got away with it because of a technicality. Would have looked dubious, but it seems to work.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
21st January 2023 at 4:23 pm #203173Or take out a court injunction and pretend it never happened!!
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
21st January 2023 at 8:51 pm #203181Maybe he should have hired 30 lawyers to give him a helping hand for the injunction to last.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.