Home › Community › General Football › City
- This topic has 223 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 4 months ago by threeps.
-
AuthorPosts
-
12th February 2023 at 11:53 am #204185
Blueson, I would agree with you re FFP but once rules are agreed all have to abide, would you not agree?
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
12th February 2023 at 11:58 am #204186Wow some really bizarre comments on here. I really never get why city fans can not just enjoy their success. Adlab always moans about something. I donβt begrudge their success one bit. Really tough times in the past in league 1etc. Just enjoy it and bizarre comment that utds titles are tainted more then cities?
Conspiracy theories, agendas wtc, itβs laughable. Pep aswell now with some really foolish comments.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
12th February 2023 at 12:15 pm #204191Sean that is what I said in my posts …and Iβm not bothered what other teams do or what they spend and that indies Chelsea!!! ..all adds to the premier league,if we are guilty ban us
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
12th February 2023 at 12:27 pm #204192City boy, so your defence would be to say, “hey stop picking on us for years of deception, chelsea just signed mudryk and badiashile on 8 year deals!” π€£
Comedy gold this thread, keep the absurdity coming.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
12th February 2023 at 12:34 pm #204194Where have I complained about city being picked on lucky ..I love the snipes at city the more the better…makes me chuckle
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
12th February 2023 at 12:41 pm #204195City boy, its clear that was satirical but your reaction was to point fingers rather than address the actual issues.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
12th February 2023 at 12:57 pm #204198I glanced at a report on Pep and how the titles won belong to City.
If the genie is let out of the bottle, if anything the complexities of every other team impacted is pure spaghetti tangles. Those players on the pitch were bought, but was it fair one might question. Anyway from a personal point of view, I already mentioned, I’m not bothered about retro titles; it’s done and it’s history.
But something severe most definitely if found guilty going forward. No fine, but something like expulsion or a heavy points deduction to send out a clear message of the penalties faced.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
12th February 2023 at 1:07 pm #204201Nil, it will come down to which and how many of the charges stand up to scrutiny. For example, Its one thing knowing they very likely were fraudulent regards commercial revenue but proving it is another, if it weren’t for the leaked emails I dont think it could be proven.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
12th February 2023 at 1:25 pm #204202On a little lighter note, I predict Adlab will return if Man City win versus Villa today π π
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
12th February 2023 at 2:32 pm #204203Blueson, absolute nonsense to compare City’s spending and alleged cheating to what Utd did under Ferguson.
Ferguson took over a club who had a net spend of minus Β£1.5mil in the 5 years preceding his appointment and Β£14mil total in the 5 years post his appointment (both Spurs and Liverpool spent more during this period). Newcastle, Liverpool, Chelsea, Everton, Spurs and even Man City outspent Utd massively during the period 92-98.
Again, this deflecting everything that ever comes at City and somehow finding a way to blame either Liverpool, Utd or Chelsea is just bizarre.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
12th February 2023 at 2:33 pm #204204No Nil, he’ll return if Utd get a penalty ππ
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
12th February 2023 at 2:47 pm #204205Discussions on Sky this morning suggested the charges are less about FFP and more about fraud?
City fans trying to defend their Club is understandable but attacking other Clubs that haven’t been charged with anything related to the City charges nullifies any defence.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
12th February 2023 at 2:53 pm #204206It’s fraud to evade FFP by looks of it Nine.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
12th February 2023 at 2:55 pm #204207Never been a fan of FFP, if a club has the finances available they should be free to spend it however they wish too, it’s almost reminiscent of a communist state, ” you will spend how much we tell you too otherwise it’s off to jail with you “. Very autocratic state of affairs.”
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
12th February 2023 at 2:58 pm #204209What about fraud rover? You ever been a big fan of that?
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
12th February 2023 at 3:01 pm #204210https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/man-city-ffp-fraud-news-premier-league-b2279693.html
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
12th February 2023 at 3:08 pm #204211LD, Not sure what you mean what are these fraud charges,! Isn’t it about spending over the required amounts allowed within the premier league?
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
12th February 2023 at 3:23 pm #204213Lucky,your post from the Independent puts meat on the bones of the fraud charges and if accurate is pretty damning, reading the Independent article would make me very nervous if I was a City fan.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
12th February 2023 at 3:24 pm #204214Rover, decent explanation in the Independent article above provided by Lucky.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
12th February 2023 at 3:29 pm #204215Yeah rover see the article
Nine, I cant see it being proven in terms of a civil case, UEFA gave approval for the sponsorship with etihad at the time for example, and while we all know clearly that the money from Etihad was money from the owner, proving it at the level it would need to be proven is unlikely. The consequences of finding them guilty are so high it won’t happen imo.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.