- This topic has 223 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 5 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
To be fair Alfie that is a water tight and genuine defence mate.
However my understanding is the issue is not that city’s commercial income was inflated via subsidy of owner via third company owned by its same owners, its that they advised the other premier league clubs to the contrary at that time. Call it deception, lies or fraud but in my understanding that’s where main issue is.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
Absolutely, Lucky. But I, probably like most people and especially like all of the City fans at the time, took their statement regarding comprehensive and irrefutable evidence to mean comprehensive and irrefutable evidence that they did not do what the PL are saying they did, not comprehensive and irrefutable evidence that the rules didn’t exist!
Just seems a massive let down and that there will be an asterisk next to the trophies.
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.