Home › Community › General Football › City Banned
- This topic has 302 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 4 years, 4 months ago by nine nine nine.
-
AuthorPosts
-
20th February 2020 at 10:29 am #72485
i do get what many on here are saying, but some emails (no matter how damning) cant be the only evidence, all i know is that all i know about this is from various sources, you dont know are real or agenda driven or accurate, unless someone gave me all evidence i cant really judge, not an informed one anyway
not giving city a let off tho to my eyes they havent done anything wrong except to challenge the established old boys in europe, no way they have been worse off than PSG orRM and Barca who have been state funded for decades
frankly the whoile argument stinks of Pygmailion!!!
Everyone is equal, some are mroe equal than others π
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th February 2020 at 10:29 am #72486Too early???
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th February 2020 at 10:30 am #72488Special K.. we’ll agree to disagree on that… π
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th February 2020 at 10:40 am #72493Chucky, re your post @8:32am I already said in my post @8:14am “If the only evidence is the e mails then City have a problem and even if Cityβs Lawyers were to argue as is likely that the e mails are inadmissable and they manage to overturn the ruling based on that it would still leave a shadow hanging over City.”
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th February 2020 at 10:44 am #72498I know that, why are you repeating it? π
I’m still waiting to hear a theory on how City are even remotely innocent of all this, barring some ludicrous “technicality” about how the e-mails became public knowledge.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th February 2020 at 10:54 am #72507Chucky, because imo it answered the question you posed.
You won’t “hear a theory on how City are even remotely innocent” because nobody knows the evidence that City will put forward to CAS.
If the e mails are ruled inadmissible and that’s all City have then it might get City off the ban but it would forever leave a shadow hanging over City.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th February 2020 at 10:57 am #72508We can speculate on a innocence “theory” though, that’s half the fun… but I can only come up with 2.
#1 The e-mails are fake
#2 The e-mails are genuine and it’s all a part of an elaborate and long-game April Fools joke by City to make UEFA/Footydebate look silly. π
As for the shadow, they’ve already go that, that’s not going anywhere…
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th February 2020 at 10:59 am #72513There are no IFS or BUTS,there WILL be a shadow hanging over City forever,no matter what.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th February 2020 at 11:05 am #72516lot of short term memories and hatred if you ask me
so many other clubs have had so many bad things that cast a shadow and its all forgot about now for the mosti must be one of the very few who think this is all a load of shit persoanlly and IF EUFA win then thats it for football, no other club can ever get close to the established big boys and they themselves can spend what they want when they want how they want and getting the “money” from any source just like the always have
still gives the mother hens plenty to talk about and feel morally superior ;P
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th February 2020 at 11:05 am #72517Chucky, City might have the Shadows but they’ve still got no Cliff though.?
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th February 2020 at 11:07 am #72518classic nine!! nice one!
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th February 2020 at 11:13 am #72523I would hate to be warded the pl
From
6 years ago. City won that and itβs their trophyI donβt really care what happens to city.
Something needs to be clarified soon as the clubs chasing 4th need to know will fifth get them into the cl
Iβm sure once city launch their appeal , the ban will be suspended and this will go on for years
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th February 2020 at 11:27 am #72531Cliff Richards???
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th February 2020 at 11:46 am #72541Steveo @ 11:09am – best post on this thread…..nice one.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th February 2020 at 12:08 pm #72552Cliff Richards, OJ City, perfect match, both a bit dodgy… π
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th February 2020 at 1:08 pm #72579Any room for Rolf Harris???
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th February 2020 at 1:08 pm #72580Anonymous“Fortunately the majority on here wonβt sit in judgement of this case otherwise City could save themselves the air fares to Switzerland.?”
There is a world of difference between what we’re doing here and the weight of jury duty/judge or the likes Nine π You might not think so but I’d take that kind of responsibility incredibly seriously, were it on my shoulders. It isn’t though, however. So I’m free to speculate. The same goes with being a fan and not having to be professional about our approach to games. We can say it’ll be a walk in the park etc but a player never could.
anyway, you had to at least admit that this isn’t just idle speculation. There’s actual leaked evidence for once! hahah GUILTY!!!! I joke (maybe lol)
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th February 2020 at 1:21 pm #72589Careful all charges against Cliff Richard were dropped and he won substantial damages against the BBC. Let’s not put the site and possibly the Ed in any possible danger as unlikely as that may be.
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th February 2020 at 1:29 pm #72593I was referring to his so-called winery, don’t know what you’re talking about…
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
20th February 2020 at 1:37 pm #72598I believe you Chuck’s you’re an expert on having a good wine!?
_____________________________
React below π
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.