They obviously guilty, no doubting that, but how guilty?
What punishment fits the crime??? Not at all bothered about stripping titles… (but that doesn’t effect my spuds one way or the other! 🙂 ) Would like to seem them relegated, a punishment which I think “fits” with other clubs who have been punished for similar offences.
And there’s one angle here I don’t think anybody has thought of. The 115 get creative with their accounting practices, get to spend more money than they should have as it was accounted for extremely creatively, but that money was also paid out to clubs in the way of transfer fees.
Could/would Spuds then sue the 115 for whatever reason, even though they received 50 plus million “monopoly money” from the 115 when they bought Walker? Could the 115 argue any clubs who received a transfer fee from them were “compliant” in the 115 actions?
_____________________________
React below 👇
*hover/click on the number below the reaction to see who reacted